My worst nightmare happened. Not even Zack Greinke could prevent the stupid Twins from sweeping the Royals, who chose the worst times to get hot and then go in a slump. Plus we all knew it would be completely unreasonable to expect the Tigers offense to score more than one run against Freddy Garcia (4.34 ERA), so how could the Tigers possibly take 2 of 3 from a non-playoff team at home.
Ryan Raburn
Posted by Nathan SportelLord Bettman's......ERRRRR.......Stanley's Cup Finals
Posted by David VriesmanThis is the world we live in. A team loses in Game 7 of Lord Stanley's Cup and their fans must find ways in which to relieve the pain from a head on collision with reality. "Fans" will spew obscenities about opposing players, coaches, fans, and even the League. As if only the NHL itself could keep down our Kingly Wings. Bandwagoners cannot live with the fact that they hitched a ride on a trail that ended up plummeting over a cliff instead of to "them thar mountains" with a giant silver cup filled with gold, and possibly Crosby's pubic-like beard hair. Casual fans who don't know who the Wings third line Center is or our second line defenseman are cannot believe that such a great team could possibly have gotten so screwed. Even some of the die-hard fans out there believe all of this was some sort of mirage or chirade for Bettman to get "Cindy" (his?) Cup. Listen good all you deficient, incendiary provocateurs. We simply got beat.
I love conspiracy theories. Especially the ones like the government caused 9/11 to rally the American people against Muslims, or that they created the AIDS virus to rid the world of "undesireable" people and their habits, or maybe that our government had plenty of advance knowledge of Pearl Harbor and did nothing. Oh, and let's not forget Princess Diana, UFOs, and JFK, to name a few. H.L. Mencken once said, "The central belief of every moron is that he is the victim of a mysterious conspiracy against his common rights and true desserts. He ascribes all his failure to get on in the world, all of his congenital incapacity and damfoolishness, to the machinations of werewolves assembled in Wall Street, or some other such den of infamy." Whatever helps you sleep at night eh? If you want to delve deeply into paranoia and the absence of logic or probable thought, that's your business. But Bettman's business is trying to expand his product. Yes, he's made mistakes in hyping Crosby too much, but he is looking to increase the viewership of the NHL and has made the biggest contracts in NHL history with TV and radio sponsors. He even brought the NHL back from the Lockout. Unfortunately, Bettman is a smart businessman, and smart businessmen do not put their careers on the line for a Tim Donaghy-ian type backlash. If you must believe that Bettman screwed the Wings out of a Championship, just realize that most people around the world would consider you clinically insane.
I will grant that the national media does not consider Detroit one of their darlings. It's no surprise that Bettman would prefer the Cup go elsewhere, just like Selig loves Subway Series' or BoSox vs. Dodgers. Don't you think Stern was leaping for joy that LA won the NBA championship? Michigan as a whole and Detroit as a microcosm are considered the beaten stepchild of New York, LA, and Chicago among others. They regard our victories as anomalies and sound like a loving mother talking to her handicapped child, "Aww! You did so good honey!" And while we may have an inferiority complex that has a foundation in legitimacy, our destiny is our own. Selig did not force every Detroit Tigers pitcher to not know how to throw to first base in '06, Roger Goodell did not send down a mandate for a t-shirt that had "Built Ford Tough" written on it with a Lions logo, David Stern did not tell Joe D. he had to trade Chauncey (still a good trade), and Gary effen Bettman DID NOT lose this series for the Wings.
Gary Bettman did not give us a 2-0 series lead, only to squander it. Gary Bettman did not give us a 3-2 lead, only to squander it. Hell, it almost seemed like he was on the Wings side there for awhile didn't it? Except the Wings were OFFsides so much it didn't matter. The Wings were worse closers than I was in college, and that's saying something. And Gary Bettman surely doesn't have the mind boggling power to make sure we played with no sense of urgency at the Joe in Game 7 of the Stanley Cup finals. He didn't get the Pens so geeked up for the game that they chased the puck harder than a teen boy on viagra. No, that was Coach Dan Bylsma, who graduated from my high school; and if he brings the Cup to Muskegon I will seriously jump off their new high rise building. . . I digress. . .
In essence, it would have been better for the Winged Wheels to lose indefinitely. Yes this sounds putrid to us all, including me who relished in our 7-0 thumping of Patrick Roy and the Avs in Game 7. But knowing we had another gear that was out of commission until 5 minutes were left in the third period? That is unconscionable. No one should have to tell a veteran team what the stakes are. That's like telling Dane Cook he's not funny, he should already know. And to show that they had more so late in the game after they had been thoroughly outplayed is bush league. It was almost as if we've seen the Pistons reincarnated. Winning a championship . . . coming back to the Finals . . . and being too comfortable for the last 60 minutes of play possible in a season for a chance at immortality and the words Legacy, Legendary, Dominant, and Storied. It's almost too hard to write about.
It's obvious that the Wings had more talent on their roster than the Pens. The Pens coach, players, and media even said as much multiple times throughout the course of the series. But as the Wings have found out many times over the past decade of 100 point seasons, the best team doesn't always take home the Cup. Yes, injuries took a toll with the likes of Lidstrom, Datsyuk, Draper, Kopecky, and Lilja missing multiple games if not series'. But that is only a testament to the Wings depth, not an excuse for the way that they finished out by losing 4 of 5 games to an inferior team. Basically it looked to me as if they got caught staring at all the bling on their fingers instead of playing with the heart and desire to match the hungry, upstart Penguins who expunged their inferiority complex. . . Sidenote: The parents of the Baileys should take notes on how to expunge inferiority complexes from the Penguins. Boss and Champ? Really?? . . . Zetterberg said it best afterwards when he pronounced that the Wings "needed this" and that it "wasn't fun, but will bring us back stronger." Fans would hope that the team wouldn't have to go through such a crushing loss to gain back the fire to win, but everyone is human. There is an innate sense of complacency and an entitlement mentality among players who are used to winning, which helps explain why repeating as Champions is always so difficult.
And yet they are not the "Dead Wings" or "Dead Things" or any of the other horrible things they've been called by friend and foe alike. This team is still very talented and no matter what roster changes happen during the summer to stay under the cap, they will once again be a favorite to win Stanley's preferred drinking mug. In fact, they were the last ones to win incredible back to back championships in '97 and '98, then again in '02 and '08. They have the pedigree and talent to be a force for the next decade, so this is no memorial, epitaph, or eulogy (pronounced ya-goo-ga-ly). Are the Wings guaranteed to hoist the Cup next season? No, of course not. But year in and year out, they are the alpha dog of opportunity for that chance. At least Hossa got that part right.
Dontrelle Willis
Posted by Nathan SportelDontrelle Willis pitched 6 and 1/3 innings of 1 hit ball last night.
Johan Franzen
Posted by Nathan SportelJohan Frazen is a simply incredible hockey player. I offer this video as evidence of some of this guy's incredible skills.
Clete Thomas
Posted by Nathan SportelCan someone please tell me what Jim Leyland sees in Clete Thomas that I don't?
Larry Foote
Posted by Nathan SportelSo, Larry Foote is in town. I have to admit that Larry Foote was my second favorite Michigan Linebacker ever (Ian Gold being my favorite) so obviously I would love him to come to town. But seriously, the Lions, who won ZERO games last year and had a guy named PARIS playing middle linebacker last year, are saying they need to make sure HE FITS THE SCHEME!?!? When you win 5 games you get the luxury of fitting guys in schemes. When you are the Lions and you haven’t won a game in over a year and a half, you take ANY talent you can get. How often do you A) get a guy who WANTS to come to Detroit, and B) actually fits a gaping whole in your team? This is RARE!!! Don’t forget this guy has won multiple super bowls, is a leader/all around good guy, and doesn’t want a long term contract. This is a match made in heaven!Seguir leyendo...
If I was martin mayhew I would have a 2-3 year, 3.5 million dollar contract (he made under 3 last year) ready for him to sign the second he walked into Ford Field. But then again, I wouldn’t draft a TE in the first round, so clearly I know nothing about how to rebuild a football team.
Draft Recap
Posted by Nathan SportelI want to begin this post with a quick apology for my hiatus over the past few weeks. I have 2 more weeks of exams and then I should be back to my regular, weekly posting schedule. Thanks for still tuning into the blog though. For those of you who want to stay updated without having to access the site everyday, we do have an RSS feed on this site. The URL for the feed is http://www.putitinstoneblog.com/feeds/posts/default . Feel free to post that into your favorite RSS Tracker (Mac users, may I suggest NetNewsWire, it is really good and free). That way your RSS feed will alert you of any new posts on Put it in Stone without having to access the site! Anyway, lets get to business.
Better Late than Never: BASEBALL PREDICTIONS!!!
Posted by Nathan SportelOpening Day is finally here! Baseball season has begun and honoring the theme and spirit of this blog, I bring you my predictions for the 2009 season. Of course, predictions like this are really meaningless because a single injury or trade could change the whole completion of the season changes. Now that the boilerplate stuff is out of the way, lets begin! I bring you my predictions for all the division leaders, the respective league MVP's and Cy Young Winners and my World Season prediction!
Reefer err I mean Bracket Madness
Posted by Andy MooN
I heard some of you are really STRUG-GEL-LING with your brackets. You getting beat by you roommates girl friend, who pick her winners based on criteria such as what teams uniforms would most likely appear on What Not to Where. You even overheard her say, “there’s no way Clinton would wear those awful black Purdue uniforms. He’d go with the classic UCONN look.” Or are you losing to the guy in the cubicle next to you, who has watched two college basketball games all year. The only player in the tournament he has actually heard of is Tyler Hansbrough. He picks all caulk and some crazy upset that of course happens. I can almost guarantee knowledge college basketball fans are losing to an individual such as this. Of course maybe you’re sitting in seventh place out of 32 people like me, but everyone above you has the same freaking teams left. Well, as other things I have fixed in sports (see MooN’s NCAA Football Playoff System or the MFPS for short) I have a system that will eliminate your programs. Once again I will be returning the bullet format for the sake of clarity.
· Disclaimer #1: This system only works for knowledgeable fans and only on a small scale. There’s no way this system works in your office pool in which over 100 participate. It’s too complicated and would be time consuming. You also need a group of individuals that understand how seeding and upsets work. Your cousin’s seven year old son can’t participate here. It wouldn’t work.
· Disclaimer #2: This system is for those expecting more out of their pool. It seeks to eliminate the five minute fill, the crazy upset guy, similar brackets, and going with the caulk. This is for the fan looking to take things to the next level (see Nate’s fantasy football system).
· Disclaimer #3: This system seeks to reward those, who actually make tough picks. I feel that it is unfair to reward someone for picking a #1 seed over a #16 the exact same way as someone, who picks the right #12/$5 upset. It doesn’t make sense. Seeing brackets are essentially a form of gambling they should be based on odds, right?
· Without further ado: The MooN NCAA Tourney Bracket System (copyright 2009)
· The system increasing the amount of points given per round as the teams advanced in the tourney like most systems
· 1stx1, 2ndx2, Sweet 16x3, Elite 8x4, Final 4x5, Championship x6
· Points are also given according to seed
· 1-2 start value= 1 point,3-4= 2 points, 5-7= 3 points, 8-10= 4 points, 11-14= 5 points, 15-16= 6 points
· Bonus 5 pts for each Elite 8 team, 10 pts per Final 4 team, 15 per Championship game team, 20 for winner
· Bonus 10 points available in each round for most games picked correctly
What do you think? I am completely open for suggestions on perfecting my system. I believe this system would greatly reduce the likely hood of losing to that guy, who asked you at the water cooler what a Zag was. It also rewards picking upsets correctly instead of going caulk, while not giving so many points that picking higher seeds is not reward. This would make strategy more important for example in a small pool it makes no sense to pick upsets when going with the 1 and 2 seeds will win 90% of the time. This system will also eliminate the likely hood of losing a bracket because of one pick made in the first or second round. I believe that people should be rewarded for picking one 5 seed in the final four correctly more than picking two 1 seeds. What’s harder to do? I bet your brother-in-law’s first wife wouldn’t know, but if you’re reading this you probably do.
Seguir leyendo...Great Season
Posted by Nathan SportelAfter getting over the initial shock of realizing the season was over, and after moving past the initial anger towards the referees, who gave Blake Griffin a Lebron-like treatment, I just wanted to reflect on this past season for the Michigan Wolverines.
Live Blogging
Posted by Nathan Sportel12:56: Alright, here is my situation for context. Over at my friends house, got the DirecTV Mega March Madness Package going, sitting in the lazy boy, computer on my lap, and other "enjoyable items" within arms reach. I will be in this position all day, and tomorrow and hopefully the rest of march.
BRACKETS!
Posted by Nathan SportelJay Cutler
Posted by Nathan SportelAs I sit here mulling over my bracket picks (which I will post tomorrow), I thought I would clear my head and write a quick post about the Jay Cutler to the Lions situation.
Get Rid of Conference Tournaments
Posted by Nathan Sportel
I will be honest; I could do without conference tournaments. They are unrealistic, overhyped, and frustrating.
As a subscriber to this sports blog, you inevitably ran into the ESPN “Championship Week!” commercials. Also, as someone who reads my likely meaningless words, you probably see eye-to-eye with me on many issues, including how annoying these commercials were. The hype for these conference tournaments is unbelievable. Do you really care who wins the Horizon League? I don’t, until I see a bracket. And yet, we are berated by an onslaught of inconsequential basketball games – even in the major conferences. Don’t get me wrong, I love watching college basketball, but I am just trying to get you to see conference tournaments for what they really are: money-makers for television networks.
You may not all agree with me, in fact, for some people, the conference tournament is an image of hope, as sitting atop the figurative Aggro Crag representing a grueling, 4-day tournament is an automatic bid to the NCAA tournament. An automatic bid essentially erasing 4 months of poor play, and replacing a dreadful season with, believe it or not, a conference championship! Can you believe it folks; it only takes 4 wins to make the NCAA Tournament.
For some people the conference tournament is a source of fear (see: Penn State, St. Mary’s, San Diego State, etc.). Teams like Cleveland State (52 RPI, only 2 wins against the top 50, one of those coming in the conference tournament) stole a bid from an arguably more deserving team like St. Mary’s, whose only sin was having their star player get hurt, or Penn State, whose unforgivable transgression was scheduling a relaxed non-conference schedule.
The reason that this fear exists is simply because teams KNOW they are in. It is really not surprising that during “Championship Week” there are so many upsets. The classic upset follows the formula of teams playing for their lives vs. teams that only care about seeding. If anyone watched the Pitt Game, or the LSU-Miss. State game, you know they didn’t give it their all.
The lack of effort stems from a natural human reaction to a meaningless game: apathy. If LSU won the SEC would they have gotten a higher seed than 8 seed? Maybe, but they would not likely have gotten a much higher seed than a 7. So, what difference does it make to LSU if they lose to Mississippi State and get a day off instead of playing for a conference tournament championship? Exactly, nothing.
So, unlike any other tournament in major sports, conference tournaments are completely unrealistic. College Basketball teams never play more than 2 games a week, except in this tournament. Even in the NCAA tournament, teams get a day off between matchups. In a conference tournament, teams have to play 3-4 days in a row to win the tournament. Do good teams really want to wear themselves out for 3 more days before eventually receiving that inevitable #1 seed? Pitt didn’t, Michigan State didn’t mind settling on a #2.
So, I ask you this. Would you really miss the conference tournament? If they moved the NCAA tournament a week earlier (thereby making it really March madness, instead of March/April madness), would you care? Would you feel outraged if you were a Miss. State fan? Or would do you sympathize with the Penn State fan? I guess my point is the season is 30+ games in duration, while the conference tournament is 3-4 games long. Clearly the longevity of the regular season is a much better representation of a team’s success. So erase the conference tournament and make the selection committee’s job a little easier because I think most see my point and could really take or leave the conference tournament.
Seguir leyendo...John Beilein...
Posted by Brian DemorayBefore I get into the awesomeness that happened at 6:30 on Sunday night I want to take this time to apologize for my extended absence from writing. I have been busy, but mostly I just haven’t been struck by anything in particular to write about. As Nate put so eloquently, there is a ton of stuff going on this week so I too plan on being an active participant this week.
On that note, today’s post is brought to you by procrastination. Why post today? I can ALWAYS wait till tomorrow…sorry guys.
Ed DeChellis (Head Coach at Penn State) and Tom Izzo split the coach of the year award in the Big Ten this year. Congratulations to both of them are in order for very productive and successful years. Now that my manners are out of the way, I want to tell you that it’s bull crap that both of them won this award over John Beilein.
DeChellis’s Nittany Lions went 15-16 last year and finished seventh in the Big Ten with a 7-11 conference record. Compare that to this year at 22-11 and 10-8 and you can see a significant improvement over the year. Izzo on the other hand, led his Spartans to a 27-9 record last year with a 12-6 Big Ten record. This year the Spartans went 26-6 and 15-3 respectively. Izzo maintained the excellence he so frequently demands and gets out of his players this year.
John Beilein on the other hand went 10-22 last year with a second to last place 5-13 Big Ten record. This year, not only did the records change to 22-10 overall and 9-9 Big Ten, but Beilein’s Wolverines are NCAA Tournament bound for the first time in ten years. After changing around his starters for a big portion of the non conference schedule, he finally settled on starting 4 guards and one forward for most of the Big Ten schedule and into the post season. In a conference loaded with talent (MSU I am talking about you) Michigan starts a pudgy, white freshmen shooting guard at power forward (Zach Novak.) Michigan also starts a committee of walk-ons at point guard or occasionally the defensive liability Kelvin Grady. With not a single starter taller than 6’8 and no smell of a 5 star recruit since the ‘sigh’ Ellerbee days, Beilein was able to completely flip the teams record in one year from the worst in school history to being NCAA Tournament bound.
When it all comes down to brass tacks, DeChellis did a lesser form of what Beilein did but with more experienced players and no past NCAA sanctions looming over his head. Izzo had a great season and his Spartans won the conference out right for the first time since 2001, but does he start any walk-ons? When was the last time Izzo was ever as talent deprived as Michigan is now? Oh yeah, I know, it was before Michigan got in trouble by the NCAA. Congratulations Tom for doing exactly what everyone thought you would do, win, and do so with excessive amounts of talent. So, although both Izzo and DeChellis had admirable seasons, neither of them stacks up even close to what Beilein has accomplished in his short tenure at Michigan.
As for Thursday’s game against Clemson, I pretty much agree with every bit of analysis that Nate has brought up. Although on paper Michigan is an underdog (10 seed and +5.5 points to Vegas,) they are by no means EXPECTED to lose. With Clemson not being very tall either, our 1-3-1 zone may actually be somewhat effective too.
Remember our team’s motto; shoot first, cross the timeline later. When that doesn’t work remember that DeShawn Sims is on your team. Death to Clemson. Its Great to be a Michigan Wolverine.
Busy Week!
Posted by Nathan SportelIt is a busy week in sports, so as a result it will be a busy week for me as well! Today I offer the Michigan keys to victory. Tomorrow a post about the Lions getting Cutler, Wednesday I will post my brackets, and Thursday through Sunday, I hope to live blog most of the tournament games as I hope to watch all games (with DirecTV's sweet service)
- Coaching. Beilein has as history of success in the NCAA tournament, Prunell has lost every single tournament appearance in the first round. Any sort of “chess match” between these two will clearly go to Michigan’s Beilein.
- Clemson is not a team with tremendous size. Everyone knows Michigan is a small team and any 4.8 rebounds per game type becomes a 8-9 rebound per game type. That said, almost any team will have a size advantage against Michigan, but Clemson doesn’t have much of one. Clemson is not like a Florida State or Ohio State that just could beat Michigan because of a clear size advantage. Booker is a good player, but I think the size advantage is not enough to overcome Michigan’s defense and shooting advantage.
- Pace of Play/Clemson’s press. Michigan has never struggled with a press all year. Because they are a well coached team that isn’t looking to run, Michigan’s three guard offense will not struggle with this press. Michigan will look to get it over the timeline and set up their offense. They proved my theory by beating strong teams. UCLA tried to press us to no avail. I expect Kelvin Grady to play a little bit bigger role in handing the ball, but walk-on CJ Lee has been fairly careful handling the point (only 19 turnovers all year, 2.8 assist/turnover ratio). The pace of play will put Clemson in long defensive sets. Michigan will confuse Clemson with their constantly changing defensive zones and looks, slowing the pace down even on Clemson’s side of the ball. The UCONN had one of their lowest scoring games of the season against us, and expect Clemson to suffer the same fate. The lower the total points, the more Michigan gains an advantage.
- Free Throw shooting. As with any NCAA tournament game, I expect it to be close and the winner will probably be the team that shoots free throws at the end of the game. Michigan ranked first in the big ten with a 75.5% free throw shooting with one of the best free throw shooters in Manny Harris shooting almost 86%. Clemson as a team shoots 68%. Expect Manny to drive, get to the line, and convert.
- Lastly, Trend. Michigan is on a bit of an upswing in their schedule, while Clemson has been struggling more as of late. Also, Michigan seems to really show up for big games. They played their heart out against UCONN, Duke, UCLA and all their big games. They needed a win against Iowa and destroyed them. This is the biggest game of the year and I have no doubt they will play their hardest.
DUMARS FOR GM OF THE YEAR
Posted by David VriesmanI’m sure I will lose the very few people who might enjoy reading some of the nonsense I write on this blog, but I can’t help but laugh at the hatred that’s being thrown in the general direction of the Pistons these days, and in a more direct way to my boy Joe. Now the title of this post is obviously overblown. He is in no way a part of the running for GM of the year in any circle of people not associated with a GED reunion. But there is definitely a foresight shown by Dumars that the average fan, and many talking heads, doesn’t seem to appreciate.
Obviously the trade Joe pulled to send Chaunce to the Nugs for AI appears to be one of the worst trades the franchise has ever suffered. Chauncey has led the Nuggets to one of the top spots in the West, joining the Lakers and Spurs as true Western Conference contenders. Meanwhile, the Stones have been relegated to .500 ball and fighting for a playoff spot after making the Eastern Conference Finals for the past six years. Looking at the impact of the trade over the course of the year would lead one to believe that it was as much of a “no contest” loss for the venerable Dumars as OJ Simpson’s murder trial, but it all had to play itself out there too didn’t it?
I’ve written previously on how I believe Rodney Stuckey is the young, dynamic point guard of the future who has a Finals MVP in his future. I wrote that the cap flexibility that the Pistons have created will give them a great chance to find an All-Star big man to go along with Stuck, Rip, and
Joe Dumars was the starting point guard of the Bad Boys with Isiah (no I didn’t spell that wrong) and Company. He saw first hand what a group of hard nosed veterans who were still in their prime could do to the opposition and their star power. So he went about turning the Pistons into the same bunch of team oriented players who could go up against the opponents big guns shut them down. And within a few years, Joe had won a Championship and came within a quarter of winning back-to-backs as a GM like he did as a player.
But this is where the stories diverge. The Brass of the Pistons in the late 80’s kept the core together as they got older and watched them win fewer and fewer games, hoping that another run was in their old and tired legs. What the higher ups failed to see was that they were starting a Geriatric Committee posing as an NBA franchise. Their skills began to decline at a rapid pace, but kept hoping for “one more run” with an aging core that never materialized. Dumars was a part of those Championship teams and was a key member of participating in them. But he was also a member of the team during a good portion of the 90’s, when the team was relegated to the cellar because the younger, up and coming teams of the NBA had caught and surpassed them. This began a horrible streak for our beloved ballclub. They made a habit of not making the playoffs, had high draft picks, and had Terry Mills as their center for close to a decade. The Palace was a Ghost Town of it’s former self, and was in constant rebuilding mode reminiscent of our current Lions organization.
Basically, Joe saw first hand that a core which is kept together too long hoping for that “last great run” is only fooling themselves. And when Joe D. saw that the team had peaked, and were ousted in the ECF for a string of four straight seasons, he knew that that the time had come to react, no matter how hard that might be during the present season. He traded their floor general and brought in a “superstar” with an expiring contract who didn’t play the style that the team prides themselves on. While he knew this would throw off chemistry, he also knew that it would put himself in a position to get a player he missed out on when he had the 2nd pick of the draft. Joey has made mistakes, yes, but he always works hard to rectify them. He missed out on Bosh, Wade, and Melo, but he is now in a position to redeem himself. He will now look to pair a player of that caliber with their core. It’s quite obvious that Stuckey, Rip, and
In essence, this is a probable one or two year “rebuilding” period, in which Joe has handed the keys of the franchise to his younger players while increasing the odds of landing a big time free agent over the course of the next two seasons. Meanwhile, we are still beating some of the top teams in the league and will most definitely make the playoffs after Curry finally got the rocks to put his future, Rip, into the starting lineup and benching free agency fodder AI, who is more equipped to play with the second stringers anyhow. Remind me to send a Thank You letter to Allen’s back problems. Bringing AI off the bench with a defensive team around him with an outside shooter to dish to makes the 2nd unit as good as the Sixers were when THEY made it to the finals with AI. . . . Maybe not quite but you can understand what I’m getting at. ESPN has also reported that AI is willing to do “whatever it takes” to help the Pistons win a championship when his back is healthy enough to allow him to play. Of course, AI is in a contract year and doesn’t want to be considered a cancer going into the (probable) final free agent period of his career. Whether this is just lip service, or a true desire to win at whatever cost, you can’t help but like the chances of the Stones getting “hot” at the right time as Rip put it on PTI Thursday.
Yes, Chauncey is having a great year, and has elevated the play in